Another bad week for the Government on illegal immigration. Complacent with the fact that illegal immigration is down from last year, many factors could cause this. The gangs can lack equipment, or basically the weather is not good enough.

From the 27^th of September to the 4^th of October, the 8 days showed 1260 small boat arrivals. Looking at stats for the year Thu 1^st Jan 26 to Thu 1^st Oct 26, 19,196 illegal immigrants arrived, down 44% from last year but still way too many.

The incentives are too high to come to the UK. Anything we do in life has to have an incentive, and we seem to have what these people need.

But 19,000 people arriving this year will influence the UK economy and, lest we forget, morale among British people. All these immigrants must be paid for, and as an example, housing, transport, clothing and personal allowances.

The other problem we see now is protests concerning illegal immigration. Towns are being singled out as landing spots and are being met by protesters. Dover seems a far cry from new landings in Hampshire; they are using more dangerous routes.

Another important point is that illegal immigrants should stay in the first safe country they reach. But they travel from Italy, which is safe, through Europe to France, where they cross to the UK.

The problem with the let-them-in lefties is that they don’t seem to have any concept of size. It could be land size or money. Our little island can only take so much immigration. We are currently struggling to increase defence spending, so how can we keep paying for immigration?  

It’s time the country settled down from the Burnham bounce and got on to securing our borders because 19,000 illegal entries are not secure. Instead of looking at past years’ sm

Understanding the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)

The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) is an international treaty designed to safeguard human rights, fundamental freedoms, and the rule of law across Europe. Drafted by the newly formed Council of Europe in 1950, the ECHR entered into force in 1953. It established a legal framework to hold member states accountable to their citizens and to anyone residing within their jurisdiction.

Core Rights and Freedoms

The Convention outlines fundamental rights and protections divided into specific legal articles:

• Right to Life (Article 2): Mandates that governments must protect the right to life by law, with strict limits on the use of lethal force.
• Prohibition of Torture (Article 3): Strictly bans torture, as well as inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
• Prohibition of Slavery and Forced Labour (Article 4): Prohibits human trafficking, forced labour, and holding individuals in servitude.
• Right to Liberty and Security (Article 5): Guarantees protection against arbitrary arrest or unlawful detention.
• Right to a Fair Trial (Article 6): Enforces entitlement to a fair and public hearing before an independent court, alongside the presumption of innocence.
• Right to Respect for Private and Family Life (Article 8): Guards against arbitrary interference in an individual’s personal life, family connections, home, and personal communications.
• Freedom of Thought, Conscience, and Religion (Article 9): Protects an individual’s freedom to hold, practice, or change their religious or philosophical beliefs.
• Freedom of Expression (Article 10): Guarantees the freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information without government interference, forming the bedrock of press freedom.
• Prohibition of Discrimination (Article 14): Ensures that the enjoyment of all Convention rights is protected without discrimination on grounds such as sex, race, religion, or background.

Additional Protocols

Over time, the Convention has expanded through additional agreements known as “Protocols”. Key updates include:

• Protocol 1: Adds protections for property ownership, the right to education, and the right to free elections.
• Protocols 6 and 13: Abolish the death penalty in peacetime and under all circumstances, respectively.

The Role of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)

To enforce compliance, the ECHR established the European Court of Human Rights, based in Strasbourg, France.

If an individual believes their rights under the ECHR have been violated by a member state, they can apply directly to the ECtHR after exhausting domestic legal options and appeals. Rulings from the ECtHR are legally binding on signatory nations, often prompting changes to national legislation, administrative practices, or the payment of compensation to victims.

ECHR vs. The European Union

A common point of confusion is the distinction between the ECHR and the European Union (EU):

• The Council of Europe: An independent international organisation encompassing 46 member states that oversees the ECHR.
• The European Union: A separate economic and political union of European nations.

A nation can leave the European Union while remaining a signatory state to the European Convention on Human Rights.

Disclaimer: This article is provided for educational and informational purposes and does not constitute formal legal counsel.

The government is waging a legal war to stop migrant crime rates being published. It must be so bad to start such a crusade against the Information Commissioner (ICO).

So the Ministry of Justice is trying to stop the ICO publishing the scale of foreigners offending in England and Wales from 2018 to 2024.

The MoJ, however, said revealing the truth would be too expensive, and some of the figures would breach the privacy of some of those offenders. Think of them first.

Breaching the privacy of some offenders is a laugh. If you’re white and from England or Wales, you would get your statistic made known.

Crime and sexual crime have been increasing since we have allowed illegal immigrants to mix with the UK public. Many times, unknowing the background of a migrant.

The government is blasé when people just land here illegally without any form of identification. Criminals, rapists and religious interns left to do as they want.

But things must be bad if they are trying to cover up migrant crime figures. Every day it seems the news is covering rapes and violence from migrants.

Under the Freedom of Information (FOI) Act, we should get this info as it will not come as a surprise to anyone.

This information will show the public how dangerous some of these illegal immigrants are and how many are committing crimes.

In turn, the public, if they see the crime figures, are not going to want migrants on their doorstep in hotels, HMOs, and ex-army camps.

People are concerned about the safety of their families and especially their children. Some of these criminals come from countries with no respect for women.

Then you have the far-right protestors. This type of information will only inflame this whole situation and cause riots and attacks against innocent migrants.

But that does not stop the fact that under the FOI Act we should see the crime figures for 2018 – 24.

The government has no right to stop this. With the media reporting a cover-up, the public aren’t stupid; they know how bad it is.

It’s serious. A government cover-up. Just keep letting them in, give them a leaflet on how to behave, but it will just carry on.

How can we ever trust Labour on immigration now and in the future?

It’s a mad day when Reform is prepared to do something for the British people, yet our new PM says all is well; figures are down.

The ICO need to release the figures and show the public what’s going on.